Shanneah Havana

On March 3, 2025, a new rule restricting personal technology use during instructional time took effect. Under this policy, students are prohibited from using devices such as cell phones, headphones, and earbuds during class, with all personal technology required to be out of sight. Violations result in confiscation, with students retrieving their devices after the first offense and parents required to do so after the second. The rule, implemented by the school authorities, aims to create a more focused learning environment. However, with phone use now limited to lunch periods and short passing time, the policy has ignited negative responses among students who rely on their devices for various reasons.

While minimizing distractions in the classroom is a valid goal, the rule presents several issues. Personal technology is a tool for learning, providing quick access to research, educational apps, and translation services for non-native English speakers. Beyond academics, students use their devices to communicate with family members in emergencies or to check important notifications during class time. Confiscating personal belongings also raises concerns about privacy and the potential for loss or damage. Furthermore, these devices provide entertainment which is useful for study breaks and forcing students to relinquish their devices can negatively impact engagement, especially during non-interactive times. 

This policy, though has good intentions, does not fully consider the needs of students who use technology responsibly. A more balanced approach, such as allowing limited phone use for educational purposes would be a more effective solution. Strict enforcement without flexibility creates frustration rather than promoting a positive learning environment. Does this policy truly benefit students, or does it limit their ability to adapt and learn in a digital world?